
CREDITOR
IS PROHIBITED FROM FORECLOSING
ON PROPERTY WHEN DEBTOR FAILED TO SIGN STIPULATION FOR JUDGMENT
In
a case with very interesting facts, and one which could result
in complications for creditors holding trust deeds, an Appellate
Court has ruled that a creditor under a deed of trust could not
foreclose where the deed of trust stood as security for a stipulated
judgment which was not signed by the debtor.
In the case of Account Management Associates vs. Sanglimsuwan,
a state Appellate Court, in a split decision, reversed a Trial
Court Ruling permitting a foreclosure of a property under a deed
of trust where the deed of trust stood as security for a stipulated
judgment. In the Account Management Associates case, American
Professional Business Bureau, Inc. had filed a civil lawsuit against
property owner Sanglimsuwan. The case settled before trial. Under
the settlement, a stipulated sum was to be paid by the debtor.
The stipulated sum was secured by a stipulation of judgment, which
in turn was secured by a deed of trust.
While the debtor did sign the deed of trust in favor of the plaintiff
creditor, the debtor did not sign the stipulation for entry of
judgment. When the debtor failed to pay the amount under the stipulated
judgment, the creditor attempted to foreclose. In a suit to forestall
the foreclosure, the debtor argued that since he had not signed
the stipulation for entry of judgment, the deed of trust could
not be used to foreclose on the property.
At the Trial Court level, the Court ruled that the stipulation
was enforceable and that the deed of trust could be foreclosed
upon.
The debtor then appealed. On appeal, the Appellate Court, in a
split decision found that because the debtor did not orally stipulate
to the settlement, did not attend Court on the day the agreement
was reached, and did not sign the stipulated judgment, the Court
found that it was unclear that the property owner understood the
terms of the stipulation for entry of judgment. The Court also
specifically ruled that, even though the debtor had signed the
deed of trust, signing the deed of trust did not establish that
he was aware of the settlement of the case.
The important lesson of the Account Management Associates case
is that a creditor should make sure that, where an agreement to
pay money is secured by a deed of trust, all documents involving
the agreement, including the settlement papers, be signed. It
is noted that this case may be appealed to the California Supreme
Court.

|