
OUTRAGEOUS GOINGS ON AROUND TOWN (page
3 of 4)
Tidbits
of Law
Do you remember Costa-Hawkins? Yes, it is still around and going
strong. There is
an application of Costa-Hawkins to rent controlled property with
three units or less
that might protect an owner from a claim of excess rent. Read
this if you are in the
boat. Say you own a 3-unit or less property that at one time had
an exemption from
rent control because the prior owner lived there and you just
bought it awhile ago.
Say you are collecting the rents that were in existence at the
time the old owner
lived there. (i.e. you did not roll back the rents to the old
MAR when you bought it).
The Board says that once an owner moves off the property or sells
the property,
s/he loses the exemption and the rents must be rolled back to
the old MAR (plus
intervening AGAs). Thus many new owners find themselves in the
position of buying
an owner-occupied exempt property with high rents and having to
reduce those
rents to the old MARs until they can get an owner-occupied exemption
themselves.
Look to Costa-Hawkins for some relief. The way this works is as
follows:
If the tenant moved into an owner occupied (hereinafter "OO")
property exempted
after 1-1-96 (i.e. after the date Costa-Hawkins took effect) then
under
Costa-Hawkins the owner was allowed to establish the initial rent
without limitation if
the property was exempt on 1-1-95 (i.e. if it was an OO exempt
property then too). If
the property was not OO exempt on 1-1-95, the initial rent could
only be raised 15%
above the underlying MAR. Since Costa-Hawkins allows the owner
to set unlimited
first rent, the rent the owner set does NOT fall back to the lower
MAR after the owner
loses the OO exemption. Otherwise, the Rent Board could pass regulations
overruling Costa-Hawkins, which is not the way it works. The Rent
Control Board
has acquiesced in this Costa-Hawkins interpretation (and how it
applies to 3-unit or
less OO exemptions) with Section 3301 (g) (4) [adopted 6-10-99].
This regulation
allows an owner of 3-unit or less OO exempt property to apply
for a new base rent
based upon the initial rent that the owner receives from the new
tenant, even while
the owner is exempt under OO. Thus the current owner can freeze
in a new base
rent based on his current market rate rent prior to losing his
OO exemption. This is
a word to the wise; if you are in the process of buying a OO exempt
3-unit or less
property, be sure that before escrow closes and you own the property
that the old
owner files a registration for establishment of the new base rent
based on his
market rate rents. Once he sells the property, the base rents
he established through
registration will carry forward to your ownership with reduction.
The only difference
with our Costa-Hawkins interpretation and the Boards new
regulation 3301 (g) (4)
is that the Board wants the first rent charged to the tenant to
start after 1-1-99,
whereas it should start under Costa-Hawkins after 1-1-96. Within
this 3-year
difference, however, many an excess rent dollar lies.
Tidbits
of Law #2
Do you remember Costa-Hawkins? Well, there is a very important
provision that
people overlook. It deals with the subletting of units by original
tenants who then
move out of their units. Costa-Hawkins states that if a tenant
sublets (whether or not
it is legal to do so) and then no longer "permanently resides
there", an owner can
increase the subtenants rent to market if the subtenant
moved into the unit ON or
AFTER January 1, 1996. Thus, dont fret fighting the tenant
over whether or not he
has the right to sublet or whether or not he has actually vacated
the apartment, just
rely upon this section of Costa-Hawkins to raise the rent. The
tenant is not
"permanently residing" in the unit if he has another
apartment in town, or has moved
out of town. There is only one "permanent" residence,
and that would be the one
where the tenant resides a majority of his time. Thus hanging
clothes in a closet in
your unit and living and working in New York no longer allows
the tenant to sublet
and claim protection under Rent Control Charter 1806(h). This
is a strong tool for
the owner to use to keep control of his property and keep the
rents fair.
Tidbits
of Law #3
Do you remember Costa-Hawkins? Still? Good. We think Mr. Hawkins
should be nominated as Santa Monicas patron saint. Anyway
there is a great provision in this act which protects owners from
subtenants claims that they have been accepted as the tenant
through waiver (i.e. the owner accepted rent and should have known
that the tenant had sublet to some one else and by accepting the
rent, the owner has now accepted the subtenant in place). This
was good law before Costa-Hawkins came into being. However, read
this: As of January 1, 1996, "Acceptance of rent by the owner
shall not operate as a waiver or otherwise prevent enforcement
of a covenant prohibiting sublease or assignment or as a waiver
of an owner's rights to establish the initial rental rate unless
the owner has received written notice from the tenant that is
party to the agreement and thereafter accepted rent." What
this means is that there will be no waivers by silence or stealth.
From now on, if there is to be a waiver, it will only be after
the owner has received a written notice from the tenant that s/he
is subletting the unit and agrees to that subletting by accepting
the rent.
Go
to Page 4

|