
DID YOU EVER HEAR OF LENA SCHNUCH?
Some of
us old-timers may havebut Ill bet that the majority
of Santa Monica owners dont
remember the name Lena Schnuch. Im also willing to wager
that Marcela Rojas, reporter for the
Times never heard of her either. Marcela is the one who wrote
the story that appeared in the
Westside Weekly on Sunday January 14, 2001, about the two tenants
who switched apartments
without notifying the owner. It was no surprise to see that the
Times r eporter took the tenants
point of view!
But first,
lets talk about Lena Schnuch (pronounced Schnuck). ACTION
(through the Foundation
for the Defense of Free Enterprise) filed suit in Federal Court
on behalf of Lena in early 1988.
It had come
to our attention that 89-year old Lena suffered a stroke the previous
summer which
left her partially paralyzed and requiring around-the-clock nursing
care.
At the time
of her stroke, Lena lived in her own building and occupied a townhouse-type
apartment that she and her late husband had literally built with
blood, sweat, tears, scrimping and
saving.
After an
extended confinement in the hospital, Lenas doctor told
her daughter that elderly people
are more comfortable in familiar surroundings and recommended
that Lena be sent home and
24-hour nursing care be arranged for her.
That presented
a problem. Because she was partially paralyzed, under medical
care and requiring
nursing care 24 hours,7 days a week, Lenas doctor further
recommended that she not return to
her own townhouse style apartment with the two bedrooms on the
second floor.
But, wait
a minuteLenas building did have a two-bedroom unit
with all the living space on one
levelbut it was rented to a tenant. What was the solution?
Simpleask the tenant to leave and
have Lena move in to the first floor unit that was not a townhouse.
Sounds like
an easy answer, right? Wrong!!!
When Lenas daughter contacted the Rent Control Board, they
said that Lena absolutely could
not move into the other unit. She could not occupy it for her
own personal use. The Rent Board
suggested"If you want your property back, youll
have to go to court." Another option they said
she had was that she could sell the building and move away.
Lenas
daughter attempted to evict the tenant for owner occupancy and
was rebuffed by the court.
Was this
fair? All who knew Lena were outraged. How many people do you
know who would be
willing to work a lifetime in order to get a little security in
their old age?
Lena worked
as a waitress, carrying heavy trays and standing on her feet all
day in order to own a
building.
Her husband
worked as a gardener and together they thought they were building
some security
for their retirement years.
By the time
Lena had the stroke, her husband had passed awayshe was
alone!! Lena had left
Europe in her teens, surviving the ravages of WW I. She worked,
she saved. There were no rich
parents, no handouts. Just work and save.
They purchased
a modest home after 20 years of saving. More years of saving and
with the sale
of the house they were able to purchase a lot with an old house
on it. They were able to build 4
units on the lot at the rear of the house. Finally, they tore
the house down and put up 3 more
units in the front. The Schnuchs could be proud of their accomplishment.
The property
still had a mortgage on it and the normal maintenance requirements
when Lena had
her stroke and needed to move to the first floor in a single level
unit that she owned. AND THE
RENT BOARD TOLD HER TO GO TO HELL!!
To make
a long story shortLena lost her case in Federal Court. All
she wanted was to move
into her own unit in her own building. Lena has since passed away,
but anyone knowing the facts
of her case find it hard to forget. Now, lets move forward
13 years. A couple of tenants thought
they were helping a 91-year old woman. They would swap apartments.
The elderly woman lived on
the second floor and the younger couple lived on the first floor.
The couple felt that they could
make the elderly womans life easier by swapping apartments
with her. The elderly woman could
not climb the stairs any more was the claim. When the owners found
out about itit was the
same as a voluntary vacancy and the rent was raised to market.
Did anyone
even think of asking the owner? I dont think so! Does the
rental agreement give
tenants the right to do anything they want to do in the building?
I dont think so! Where did they
get the impression that they could "pull it off"? The
City of Santa Monica has been pushing
landlords around for 23 years. I suppose many tenants feel that
they can do anything to an owner.
GOD BLESS COSTA-HAWKINS! Does the reporter or the tenants know
even the most remedial
facts regarding landlord-tenant law? I dont think so! The
tenants took the matter to the Rent
Control Board for review. The Rent Board said it is out of their
control! Can you believe that?
THANK GOD FOR COSTA-HAWKINS!
Too bad
there will not be any hearings at the Rent Board. Maybe someone
could go in and tell Lenas story. Thanks. 

|